
Thursday News & Notes
UK union marches across campus; Cameron petitions judge on abortion bill; the war on Louisville; DNC bans anti-union consultants; Starbucks wages
Articles presenting objective information about events. If an article contains both details of the event and commentary about the event, it will be labeled with both tags.
UK union marches across campus; Cameron petitions judge on abortion bill; the war on Louisville; DNC bans anti-union consultants; Starbucks wages
Several organizations and individuals with direct experience with the criminal legal system called on Governor Andy Beshear to veto Senate Bill (SB) 163, which limits educational opportunities for incarcerated individuals.
We now have the first Beshear veto of the post-session period. And what is it about? Parking spaces.
If you look at three streams in Kentucky, two of them will be unusable for any purpose, including fishing or swimming.
Two of the many bills passed by the legislature to limit the governor’s powers were halted by a ruling issued by Franklin Circuit Judge Wingate.
As expected, the lege overrode all of Beshear’s vetoes – except for three. We’ve got the list of overrides, and the three that stood.
As soon as the governor’s veto of HB 3, the anti-abortion bill, was overridden by the legislature, Planned Parenthood announced they are suing.
Over 1,500 book bans across schools in 26 states, a rapid expansion of the practice in U.S. schools.
Impeachments cost money. But the KY House forgave the costs for the Repub, while still charging the other plaintiffs. Now they are suing.
Adams wanted the court to dismiss a lawsuit against a candidate. The judge said no, the case can move forward.
More vetoes: no concealed weapons in courts, and no expensive consultants for the pension systems.
HB 3, this session’s anti-abortion bill, was vetoed by the governor on Friday. Governor Beshear’s veto message goes to the heart of the issue right up front:
A series of article listing all of Governor Beshear’s vetoes, with explanation and some of the veto language.
Even though this bill was improved by incorporating feedback from some advocates, it is still a bad bill that harms thousands of Kentuckians, all in the name of “reducing fraud.” As more than one person has said, why harm everyone in the system for the acts of a few?